He is neither open or receptive. It contributes to no-quality decision. Each of the men stood up and accused the main character in his actions, bringing some arguments, personal statement of facts showing hostility to the accused.
It also affect the smoothness of producing idea, because most of the time, the person cannot generate a good idea that can support the decision making. By referring to this movie, we have further analyzed each and every one of them.
Throughout the film characters Mueller-Stahl is able to think independently, and never let personal bias or peer-pressure affect his decision-making. Their verdict is now a solid not guilty. This is because the he has more bad things compared the positive things.
Scott, Mueller-Stahl is able to communicate the ideas and thinking he was such a professional and do so in an organized fashion. These people are not only pleasant to look at, but only in a circle of such people, this story could take place.
Each of them come from different situations with individual and unique experiences. He will take a little longer to quote facts right time and statistics to show that he is an expert.
Yet the boy, a product of the same community is an assumed liar. He also mourned the distance that has grown between him and his son. For example when he talked to 11th juror, he told that he is marketing agency and trying to find everything that related to it.
This group was formed for a specific purpose, a time, so to build and strengthen the relationship is not a priority for the dissolution occurs when the issue decision. At the beginning, he amongst the lesser contributor less participate to the group decision making process. The tense atmosphere was kept throughout the movie.
He do not have a good in imagination, that he cannot imagine and cannot understand easily what the others think, he tend to think that he is the only one who are right, he cannot except his mistake and tend to stick with his answers.
Individual biases are not expected to affect the decision making process. This juror has more barriers compare to 1st juror. He is always being attacked with "dangerous bullets" from those jurors who voted differently, but has shown an ethical and extraordinary feedback.
Being aware of this is the first step to better understanding. A lot of movies were based on this one because the 12 angry men is very worthwhile.[tags: Movie, Film, Twelve Angry Men] Strong Essays words | ( pages) | Preview. 12 Angry Men - Twelve Angry Men is a classic movie depicting how one determined leader can alter an entire crowd.
Through dedication, curiosity, and the pursuit for the truth he is able to persuade a group of twelve to second guess even themselves.
The movie Twelve Angry Men begins with an eighteen year old boy from the ghetto who is on trial for the murder of his abusive. father. A jury of twelve men is locked in the deliberation room to decide the fate of the young boy. Six of the jurors, # 1, 3, 4, 7, 10, and 12 immediately put their hands up, but the others because of not wanting to be left out, jurors # 2, 5, 6, 11 and 9 slowly put their hands up.
The Movie 12 Angry Men Philosophy Essay add:/ Views: The movie 12 Angry Men depicts the story about 12 people serving as jury who have completely different attitudes, personalities, emotions and approaches in judging this premeditated homicide case.
Twelve Angry Men Essay Words | 3 Pages. Twelve Angry Men is a very interesting play about an unfortunate young man, who was convicted of killing his dad. The worst part was, the young man was only nineteen, and his life was just starting.
The jurors listened to all the evidence, then came the hard part, making the decision: guilty, or innocent. 12 Angry Men Movie Analysis Essay. Words Nov 20th, 4 Pages.
12 Angry Men Analysis 6 Essay. In the movie “12 Angry Men” all five methods of influence were used. The Methods of influence such as use of reason, assertiveness, coalition building, higher values, and bargaining were all used by the jurors; whether it was purposely or.Download