An overview of the theory of knowledge

Western philosophers and scientists traditionally believed that to know something fully one must know the cause upon which it necessarily depends. Empiricism Hume belongs to the tradition of British empiricism that includes Francis BaconJohn Lockeand George Berkeley Furthermore, reason can influence our conduct in only two ways.

Hume proceeds to show that a number of complex ideas in philosophy, such as the idea of an immaterial self as the core of personal identity, fail to meet his empiricist criterion see Treatise, Book I, Part IV, sec. Experience cannot establish a necessary connection between cause and effect, because we can imagine without contradiction a case where the cause does not produce its usual effect e.

Working from the empiricist principle that the mind is essentially passive, Hume argues that reason by itself can never prevent or produce any action or affection. The reason why we mistakenly infer that there is something in the cause that necessarily produces its effect is because our past experiences have habituated us to think in this way.

According to Hume, one cannot infer conclusions about what ought or ought not to be the case based on premises of what is or is not see Treatise, Book III, Part I, sec. Following Locke, Hume also distinguishes between the simple and complex.

He notes that the causal relationship provides the basis for all reasonings concerning matters of fact; however, unlike the relations of ideas explored by mathematics, no judgments that concern matters of fact are necessarily true. But since morals concerns actions and affections, it cannot be based on reason.

Simple impressions and ideas, such as the seeing or imagining of a particular shade of red, admit of no distinction nor separation.

Finally, Hume argues that even though moral distinctions are based on feelings, this does not lead to moral relativism.

Hume argues that such knowledge is impossible. Does it contain any experimental reasoning concerning matter of fact and existence? But the most famous subject of his criticism is the relation of cause and effect.

Complex impressions and ideas, such as the seeing or imagining of an apple, can be analyzed into their component parts. First, reason can inform us of the existence of something which is the proper object of a passion, and thereby excite it.

Yet all that experience establishes concerning causal relationships is that the cause is prior in time to and contiguous with its effect.


As a final point, Hume argues for a distinction between facts and values. Hume is well aware that not all pleasures and pains e. Common to this tradition is the view that knowledge is founded upon sense-perception, which the human mind passively receives.

This is because we can always imagine, without contradiction, the contrary of every matter of fact e. Hume adds that the causal relationship between any two objects is based on experience, and is not known a priori e. Whereas all simple ideas are derived from and exactly represent simple impressions, many complex ideas are not, and so their veracity must be called into question.

But should reason be in error in either of these areas e. But whereas Locke and Berkeley believe that human knowledge can go beyond sense-experience, Hume contends in the Introduction of his Treatise that our knowledge is limited to sense-experience, and so offers an empiricism that he argues is more consistent than those of his British predecessors.

Commit it then to the flames: Second, reason can deliberate about means to an end that we already desire.Psychology is a broad field that encompasses the study of human thought, behavior, development, personality, emotion, motivation, and more.

Gaining a richer and deeper understanding of psychology can help people achieve insights into their own actions as well as a better understanding of others. Critical theory is a social theory oriented toward critiquing and changing society as a whole, in contrast to traditional theory oriented only to understanding or explaining it.

Analysis Of Platos Theory Of Knowledge Philosophy Essay Many of Plato's ideas and theories were largely influenced by his mentor, Socrates, including his theories of knowledge and education.

He advocates, through Socrates, the belief that knowledge is not a matter of study, learning or observation, but a matter of recollection. Constructivism as a paradigm or worldview posits that learning is an active, constructive process.

The learner is an information constructor. People actively construct or create their own subjective representations of objective reality. New information is linked to to prior knowledge, thus mental representations are subjective.

The TOK ways of knowing are how we acquire knowledge about the world around us, and figure out our relationship with it. TOK identifies 8 different ways of knowing, each one involving a different method of gaining knowledge, but just like with the areas of knowledge, they are often intertwined and dependent on each other.

Theory of Knowledge for the IB Diploma: Student Notes Introduction These notes are designed to provide an easy-to-use summary of Theory of Knowledge for the IB.

An overview of the theory of knowledge
Rated 5/5 based on 96 review