A response to peter singers famine affluence and morality

However, it is difficult to see what more Singer could possibly say against such an objection, since he has developed his argument as carefully as possible and the objection does not even try to specify a point where the argument goes wrong.

Again, Singer advocates coordination to reduce the burden on each person, but as long as such coordination continues to be inadequate the burden on each individual should be expected to be severe.

Philosophy and Public Affairs 1 3: He grants that we feel less inclined to help people with whom we lack personal contact, but takes it as obvious that this psychological fact has no bearing on what we ought to do. However, in the first place, he denies that such a situation would be paradoxical, because the principle of preventing bad occurrences does itself take into account how much others will give; you might, from lack of information about what everyone else is doing, incorrectly conclude that the principle requires you to give more than it actually requires, but there is no self-contradiction in such a state of affairs p.

He expressed in the article that we have a moral obligation to prevent bad things from happening. This argument was presented in the article, but I feel strongly that we should first help those in our own country.

He argues that "There is a distinction between what it is best to do and what you cannot reasonably be denounced for doing" p.

IV. Duty and Charity

To acknowledge privilege is, in some sense, to acknowledge that you are not suffering to the same degree that others are. It is bad for anyone to suffer or die from destitution. At thc government level, no govcrmmcnt has given the sort of massive aid that would enable the refugees to survive fm: If a government or person can prevent something bad from happening, without either a causing something just as bad to happen i.

Similar reasoning applies if one saves fewer of the destitute than possible over the long run, or saves them less efficiently than one can, since the resources wasted could otherwise have been used to prevent other bad things from happening or to create other goods.

He is saying that to fail to give more would be morally wrong. Since Singer believes that the strong version is in fact correct p.

Bad things are still happening, people are still suffering. There are destitute people. It can be compared to giving tithes when you go to church. He uses a refugee camp as an example that people are starving to death.

Demandingness objection

Singer does not pursue these points, so I will not either, but it is worth mentioning to make sure you understand the principle. Singer admits that this needs to be taken into account when one tries to figure out exactly how much to give, but the matter is purely academic at this point for the governments and citizens of developed nations, because they clearly waste most of their money.

While I do feel that people who are able to give should; I also get the feeling that Singer would want a world where everyone has the same thing. A person who chronically is at such risk is destitute, but so is a person who suddenly is thrown into such risk by, for instance, natural disaster or war.

Response Singer On Famine Affluence Essays and Term Papers

According to the text when there is an economic exchange between people, one party is always going to try and get the most they can. Since, in the here and now, the principle of preventing bad occurrences probably requires people to reduce themselves to the level of marginal utility, there is the worry that the requirement, if advertised, will cause people who might otherwise give something to the destitute to lose their motivation to give anything at all p.

Famine, Affluence, and Morality

Is this actually required? Britain, for instance, has given rather more than most countries. Or why should I give to aid relief if no else is?

Constant poverty, a cyclone, and a civil war have turned at least nine million people into destitute refugees; nevertheless, it is not beyond Lhe capacity of the richer nations to give enough assistance to reduce any further suffering to very small proportions.

As this is the most efficient way to lend a helping hand, so to speak, Singer makes the claim that the governments and citizens of these more developed nations ought to significantly increase the amount that they give to foreign disaster relief efforts and foreign aid.

Philosophy Notes: Singer, “Famine, Affluence, and Morality”

Philosophy and Public Affairs 1 3: It therefore does little to vindicate the intuition that Nagel seeks to defend, namely, that we can promote our own projects without doing something that is wrong.

Singer is not merely saying that it would be commendable to give more to help the destitute. Buffet, unlike the self-proclaimed Christian WalMart patriarch, wrote that he believes in leaving his children enough so they can do anything, but not so much that they can do nothing.Famine, Affluence, and Morality – Peter Singer.

In this article, Singer addresses the question of what duties, if any, we owe to those who are in great need. In “Famine, Affluence, and Morality,” Peter Singer is trying to argue that “the way people in relatively affluent countries react to a situation cannot be justified; indeed, our moral conceptual scheme needs to be altered and with it, the way of life that has come to be taken.

Singer’s Famine, Affluence, and Morality In the Peter Singer’s article “Famine, Affluence, and Morality”, he discusses the way that people should take moral in their help toward the support of.

- Peter Singer's paper “Famine, Affluence, and Morality”has made a drastic impact in modern applied ethics. The simple nature of the paper makes for an easy read, yet the point clearly set out by Singer is at ends with the targeted audiences' popular beliefs.

Nov 16,  · Famine, Affluence, and Morality. Peter Singer's article, Famine, Affluence, and Morality, presents a strong view on the moral values which people all around the world today are giving to the global famine taking place these days. Famine, Affluence and Morality by Peter Singer Words | 6 Pages In his own essay “Famine, Affluence and Morality”, Peter Singer puts forth some compelling arguments for affluent people to give what they have in excess, to the suffering people of the world.

A response to peter singers famine affluence and morality
Rated 5/5 based on 75 review