There was no need to import labor -note that not many slaves were imported from Africa to these places either- and not much free empty land that could be given to European settlers.
Some other places did it on a smaller scale, but then fizzle out, notably Argentina. I am also sure the Indian men knew this, and faced with a choice between on the one hand dealing with European diseases, European guns, and Europeans after their wives and daughters, and on the other hand a sparsely populated and familiar hinterland, they plopped for the latter.
And compared to Meso and South America, my guess is that North America was simply underpopulated, even before the Europeans came, there were no great civilizations in North America like the Maya, Aztecs, Inca had further south. The phone book pages from my home town look more like those in Quebec than South Dakota.
Immigrants would flock to there to stay often driven by the chance to obtain land. That seems to be what happened in the US and Argentina.
While both the sets of colonies had diverse people, the Northern had many more immigrants and the kinds of immigrants coming to each were different. The patterns of colonisation and culture of colonisation was very different in Latin America compared to North America.
The same Portuguese or Spanish that could be telling jokes about Africans one day can just as easily be inviting them for a barbecue the day after and, if single, be courting the local beauty queen. The reason the north and south are separated is because they do have differences.
Many Spanish subjects would go to the New World to make their fortune but would return home afterwards, certainly more often than with people in the English colonies.
As the land was divided, so were the beliefs.
PreColumbian population statistics are a matter of contentious, high politicized debate. Places like Colombia and Venezuela are a bit like the Caribbean on a larger scale — malarial swamps that had to be put to use agriculturally with whatever mixture of Galicians, Extremadurans, Africans, and indigenous locals could be mustered.
However, the debate is mostly about how decimated the populations were after contact was made with Europeans and how developed preColumbian sociests were before contact. The encomienda system, which made native subjects an asset, and placed natives under the control of ex-soldiers, combined with a Catholic desire to protect the natives and a general lack of Iberian women led to a mixed population.
An influx of immigrants coaxed both the north and south into growing. In the end, the Northern and Southern colonies ended up being similar in enough ways that it could become a single country, though it was much later on.
These facts, perhaps, helped the Northern colonies to be much more diverse than the southern. The upper and lower colonies began to grow differently, while maintaining a few similarities.
North America, particularly the British part, actively encouraged immigration whether from Britain or elsewhere. Population disparity would play a part too, but I bet that if the east coast of North America had been colonised by the Spanish instead of the English, it too would be significantly more Amerindian than the United States.
Of course, the British did their fair share of evangelism, so perhaps religion alone does not explain their behaviour as compared to the French, Spanish, and Portuguese. They had sailed and sought after religious freedom, bringing their prejudices with them. The reasons for the growth are varied, but the underlying fact of the population growth answers the question.
A woman is, after all, a woman, regardless of the color of the eyes or skin. Slavery was also more of a highlight in texts for the Southern colonies because the south had more of a dependence upon them because of their plantations, which were deathly boring and similar to one another. One could of course call the premise of white North America and non-white Latin America to question — Atlanta is certainly less white than Buenos Aires, New York is certainly less white than Punta Arenas.
The United States as people know it today. The North had several different crops and were on very small farms, as opposed to the southern colonies. Prior tothe Europeaness of North and South America was not too different and the population of the Americas was definately to the south.
There were many different reasons, but it mainly concerned freedom of some sort including religious. More of the indigenous population survived, in absolute numbers, because there was more of them in the first place.Northern and Southern Colonies Differences The Northern and Southern Colonies of North America were politically, economically, and culturally very different from one another.
The people of northern and southern colonies came to the new world for very different reasons and as time went on their differences would only grow. The Southern Colonies regional characteristics include: contrast between plantations and backcountry, self-sufficient community, slavery, backcountry constant struggle and little money and jealous, coast wealthy, very diverse.
The different outcome of European colonization of North and South America is mainly due to significant differences in cultural attitudes between Northern Europeans and Europeans from the Iberian Peninsula.
Both North America and South America was named after Amerigo Vespuci. Both bordered by Pacific and Atlantic Ocean North America and South America is connected by Isthmus. 9 Similarities And Differences In The European Colonies In North And South America The Major Differences in the Colonization of North and South America between the French, Spanish and English and Subsequent Civil Rights The Major Differences in the Colonization of North and South America between the French.
English, French, and Spanish Colonies: A Comparison File Inc. All electronic storage, reproduction, or transmittal is copyrig ht protected by the publisher. THE HISTORY OF COLONIAL NORTH AMERICA centers primarily around the struggle of England, France, and Spain to gain control of the continent.
Settlers crossed the Atlantic for different.Download